November 5th, 2014 -- by Bacchus
Lick The Anal Pony-Tail Plug Before Insertion
Here’s some good advice for ponygirls and for anybody else who is about to be wearing one of those pony tail or animal-tail butt plugs:
“The better you lick, the easier it’ll go in.” Indeed!
Art is by “The Veterinarian”.
Similar Sex Blogging:
This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 5th, 2014 at 12:09 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=12739
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=12739
Um, with a white guy dressed in old timey clothes & a naked black girl, isn’t that just a bit problematic?
You know, as in slave owner & slave?
I had the same reaction, strangefriend. It just seems strange to not even mention it . . .
There’s also the making her look like a horse part. This one has too many troubling elements to be erotic for me.
Well, it’s BDSM and pony play — objectification and animalization is at least part of the point. So making her look like a horse troubles me not at all, Justin. Do we think less of a sex toy company that sells pony play gear?
Is BDSM that plays with racial issues automatically “problematic”? I’m a middle-aged white guy and thus horribly the wrong person to ask, but my best grope at an answer would be “no, not automatically.” Here are some resources on race play from sources more qualified to opine than me: Race Play Resources.
It could very well be that posting this partial panel is indeed “problematic.” I would entertain that notion, if it were accompanied by an argument. But “He’s white, she’s black” is not an argument. Even “he’s a slave owner, she’s a chattel (as opposed to lifestyle) slave” (if true, or if “true” even had a meaning in the context of artwork) would not be an argument when the panel in question appears explicitly intended as BDSM fantasy porn.
The artist calls himself “The Veterinarian”. Whatever his views on race, he’s posturing himself as having a low view of women; virtually everything I have seen from him involves treating women like animals, often in ways that would be animal cruelty if practiced on actual animals.
We should remain open to the notion that this might be a posture of fantasy; our artist could be a mild-mannered woman-affirming feminist in the conduct of his daily affairs, while confining his sexist expression to his art. But assume for the sake of argument: not so much. Assume he’s both racist and sexist (actually, we shouldn’t even assume he’s a “he”) in daily life as well as in his creation of art and his real-life practice (if any) of BDSM. Heck, assume that the above panels are part of some storyline that’s much more explicitly racist and/or sexist. All this assuming gets us to the good argument, the fun argument, the argument where I don’t already feel like I know the answers or whether I can fully defend my publishing choices: If all of those things are as assumed, what effect should it have on how I (or my audience) feels about this particular set of pixels that I actually published? Would all that assumed stuff add up to a reason not to publish these panels? Or should we look strictly within these panels for something to condemn?
This is an old discussion here at ErosBlog. In 2006 I argued that you can’t really look at drawn art and state definitive conclusions about the characters you see — they don’t have actual race, religion, ethnicity, or any other kind of social roles or status. All they have is what the viewer of art sticks on them after interpreting the art for himself or herself. This is troublesome for people who wish to police the public sharing of art they deem controversial. It’s easy to say “my interpretation of this artwork leaves me feeling uneasy about the race relations depicted therein, and thus I wouldn’t have published it.” But it’s very hard to say — I would argue it’s impossible to say — that one’s interpretation should be shared by others. To say “You, too, should feel uneasy about this artwork, because there’s no way a person of good will could interpret it differently than me” — well, that’s a much harder argument.
Admittedly, I initially had a similar reaction as the first several commenters, but my reasoning brain rather quickly got over it.
Based on over a decade of archived postings on this blog, I feel confident in saying that Bacchus holds no feelings of ill-will towards women of color, and for me to say that a woman whose depiction may quite strongly hint at an ethnicity cannot so “play the part” (so to speak), that is therein depicted, seemed frankly racist of me. So I felt it was my “duty”, if you will, to make a personal paradigm shift.
Are we not working towards a state of not seeing color?
I don’t fault Bacchus or the artist here, I’m assuming an absence of malice from each.
Besides, if these figments of imagination were in actuality real human beings, would a woman of ethnicity not have every right to orchestrate such a scenario as may be her very own personal fantasy?
If the artist is a woman of ethnicity, does she not have the right to freely express her fantasy (perhaps in hope of connecting with others who may similarly share her desires), just as the rest of us who share our own creations of erotica may want to explore those fantasies with others?
“… to be erotic for me.”
I’m stating how I feel. I’m not sure why there’s an effort to make me feel something different. If you feel something different, that’s fine, I didn’t say it’s wrong for Anyone to like this photo and find it erotic, I’m just saying what I feel when I look at that graphic. I’m not trying to impose my position on anyone, I’m just stating what it is.
Justin, you were clear about that, unlike the comments you were expanding on. And I do appreciate it.
I wasn’t trying to pick on you for not finding pony play erotic. That’s definitely a niche fetish. I just don’t get why it’s “troubling” (which sounds like a step beyond unerotic) for a woman to look like a horse in a ponyplay fantasy.
Not erotic is “this didn’t turn me on.” “Troubling” suggests an actual negative emotion. Still perfectly fair, but not at all the same thing.
I like and ok with this picture!(black female btw)