Sex Worker To Wife: Are You Fucking Him Enough?
A long time ago in the context of a discussion about porn, I advanced a theory about the historical antipathy between wives and sex workers. This theory seemed so uncontroversial to me that I didn’t think it needed expanding, explaining, or defending; rather, it was the rock-solid background against which I set my argument about porn. Here’s what I said in 2003:
Some women object to porn the way wives object to the idea of prostitutes, and for the same reason: it means they have to use actual sex, rather than their erstwhile monopoly over the possibility of access to sexual stimulus, in order to maintain and enjoy the sexual attention of their men. Women who want to have that attention without having the actual sex for which most men will cheerfully trade it are teases, in all the negative and none of the positive senses of the word.
Encoded in that paragraph is my proposition that nobody is entitled to demand the benefits of sexual exclusivity if they aren’t willing to satisfy the sexual desires of their partner. Since 2003 I’ve learned that this isn’t a gendered proposition, but I’ve also learned that the pathology of demanding an unsatisfying exclusivity is even more common than I had thought. Incompatible levels of sexual desire are common, and there are many non-monogamy (or monogamish) relationship models couples can use to cope with them. But it is both wicked and unjust for a partner to insist upon sexual exclusivity without also taking responsibility for actually having enough sex to make the relationship mutually satisfying. And this sort of wickedness and injustice? It’s dirt-common.
I was reminded of all of this by an essay in Vice by sex worker April Adams. She writes:
Dear wife,
I don’t know you, but I know that it’s possible that your husband will cheat on you with a sex worker. I say that because I am one, and I am not short on clients.
But not your husband, you say, not him! Other husbands, sure, but your relationship, your sex life, is different. You had a threesome with your college roommate ten years ago. You get a sitter and head to Vegas every August. You have that special thing with Law and Order marathons. You have a great marriage!
Let me ask you: When was the last time you had sex three times in a week? When was the last time he complained about that? Don’t you think that maybe it’s possible that he’s instead taken the problem out of your hands, which is to say into mine?
After a lengthy articulation of the reasons such a state of affairs might not actually be all that maritally-threatening, Adams concludes:
I’m not saying it’s your job to keep him happy. I am saying maybe you don’t want to sleep with him that often. You’re busy, or stressed out, or he doesn’t do it for you anymore. I get it; he almost certainly doesn’t do it for me.
That’s the point. I am the secret ingredient in a lot of healthy marriages, because when he’s seeing me, both of you are getting the amount of sex you want. As long as you leave his cellphone alone, you might make it to your 50th anniversary. You’re welcome.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=13255
I feel like the tendency towards jealousy has to be calculated into this formula somehow. Because if it were just a matter of scratching when you have an itch I would probably agree. But is it really reasonable to assume everyone is equally capable of that level of detatchment? Given that I feel like dishonesty regarding sex habits is not a workable policy, you have to ask, other than losing some kind of coercive power or attention, why would a person feel uneasy about their partner having sex outside the relationship? I feel like there are legitimate emotional reasons. If it is unjust to demand exclusivity, at least I propose it is not unreasonable to agree to it, if you feel like the benefit you might get from non-exclusivity would not outweigh the harm done to the other person.
Also, seriously, how do demands work in a relationship. There is always the choice to walk away if you get an ultimatum you can’t go along with.
Just to be clear, my position is that it’s unjust to demand exclusivity without simultaneously taking some responsibility for your partner’s sexual satisfaction. It’s perfectly legit to say “sorry, you want more than I can ever provide” but it’s really not legit to say “but neener neener, you swore a vow to eschew all others so I guess you’re just hosed, have fun suffering.”
re: “…I guess you’re just hosed, have fun suffering.”
It sounds like you’ve met my ex-wife!
It has been said that a man enjoys (and therefore values), arousal over orgasm. When I first heard this, I thought, “yeah… right…”, but then I gave it some further serious thought, and considering that an erection feels pretty damn good, and can last for a long time with skilled stimulation, and that an orgasm is rather short-lived, and feels literally anti-climactic afterwards, then perhaps there is some truth here.
If my ex had been into some serious tease and denial games, I may have even kept her around, but there was a SERIOUS deficit in the tease area. What you are talking about here, isn’t what I would call a fun femdom relationship. It’s more a relationship rife with pathology, and far too common unfortunately…
In most cases, in a monogamous relationship, there is an implied agreement to make a good faith effort to meet your partner’s needs. I’ve never attended a wedding where the female said in her vows, “Oh by the way, don’t expect me to make any efforts to pleasure you, and don’t be thinking you can touch any part of my body with any part of yours!”
I’ve known pious conservative people to say marriage and sex have nothing to do with each other, but even the New Testament of the Bible has this to say: “…The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time…”
Er… “mutual consent” being the operative phrase here…
It’s a bit sad that so many ‘followers’ of the Christian Bible are such wowsers, when if you read it clearly it really does encourage people to get it on and enjoy it.
Dr. Whiplash, I did not meet your ex-wife, but I believe I may have met some of the members of her coven. ;-)
Being a current wife in a monogamish solution, i find its also a matter of coming clean about your differences, especially where they cannot possibly reconcile, so that you may both cum regularly enough. of course, for that to work, you have to respect your spouses needs as being of equal importance to your own. Some of my friends do seem to do a thing where theyll hold on to a bad relationship, but not actively try to work out any issues that might need them to state outright their needs, while at the same time using the fact that their needs arent met as an excuse to deny their partners.
It always looks like this wierd s/m doublebind without all the fun bits to me.
[…] that’s what happened to me with this post, once I saw the interview Dan Savage gave to Playboy a month […]
@3: What you say about arousal is very interesting, and might explain some puzzling discrepancies. For me, arousal is frustrating and embarrassing, and I’d rather get to the seven or eight orgasms that will be arriving shortly afterwards. My husband often seems to want to delay orgasm until it’s practically disappeared over the horizon, by which point my ladyboner has given up and left me a seething wreck. But maybe with this information I can work out ways to capitalise on his arousal before mine gets going.
“It always looks like this wierd s/m doublebind without all the fun bits to me.”
This is why “religious” people oppose true and effective sex education. People might discover what enjoyment sex can provide, which wipes out the “once a month whether or not you need it” school of using sex as a reward. If all one can get is a little begrudged dick wetting (with revenge snarking over every little thing for the next week), one takes what one gets and likes it. Ah, marital bliss!
[…] hatred of sex workers. The people I apportion it to: sexually-manipulative wives. In my most recent expression of it, I […]
Note to misspiggy:
If I understand your problem correctly, perhaps you should show him your comment, or at least communicate it to him some time when you’re not in the middle of “doin’ it”. Work out a signal or use a phrase like “fuck me hard” or “fuck me hard NOW baby” or “God! I need to come!” when you really want him to go to it. He shouldn’t mind.
(I know I wouldn’t)