Syndicated Hoopskirt Humiliations
Apparently this moment of public humiliation was so high-larious that it got sent out over the wire for national distribution; although it happened in Belfast, Maine, I picked it up on the front page of the Mayesville, Kentucky Evening Bulletin for October 19, 1882 under the headline “Infernal Machine”:
A rather sad affair took place on one of our streets the other day. A young lady with her arms full of bundles emerged from a dry goods store when one of them fell on the sidewalk without her noticing it. Just behind her was a young man – a Belfast young man who is not polite is not anything – and he quickly stepped forward to pick it up. Now a bundle done up in a piece of paper with a dry-goods advertisement on it is apparently as harmless as a mother’s spanking; and there it lay as guileless as an angleworm, on a sidewalk after a rain. Just as he stooped to pick it up there was a rustling of paper, the twist began to come out of the ends and in another instant a bright red thing – a sort of a cross between a balloon and a devil fish – flew into the air before his eyes, and a No. 10, thirty-six-inch, double-jointed, duplex, elliptic, steel-bowed, bustle-attachment, dollar-and-a-half, red-headed hoopskirt waltzed around and gyrated and opened and shut up and fell on the walk as flat and thin as a restuarant pie; and the young man straightened himself up, looking as if he wished the tail of comet No. 2 would sweep him from this fair land, and the young lady came back with a face that resembled a sunset on a 50 cent chromo, and she picked up the wire contrivance and then she went toward the east and he went toward the west and the sun ducked his head behind a cloud to hide a smile, and three or four looked on, laid down and laughed and doubled themselves up in a manner that would have made a mess of green apples hang their heads in shame.
And that, my friends, is what they used to mean when they would say it was a “slow news day”.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=19755
I think that we need some commentator learned in 1880s clothing to explain what just happened and why it was embarrassing. But better luck next time, oh young man of Befast 70 years dead!
Here’s Wikipedia on hoop skirts; from context, there seems to have been a social taboo about women’s underthings (in which category these clearly were, despite being more structural engineering than lacy/frilly) at least as strong as today’s still-common male aversion to, say, buying, handling, or acknowledging the existence of menstruation-related products.
Wouldn’t they have another dress and a shift on underneath? I guess I have a hard time seeing a hoop skirt as any more underthings than the canvas interlining in the bodice of a dress … but maybe someone who knows 1880s New England culture can explain …
Also, a bit of googling suggests that a “50 cent chromo” is a chromolithograph print https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromolithography
It does not tell me whether they ever printed anything saucier than sunsets and old women living in shoes.
Thanks! I had wondered.