Going Medieval On No Nut November
Look. I try my level best to ignore anti-sex, misogynist nonsense, especially when it originates on the chans, or on Reddit. But when said nonsense gets properly upbraided by a medievalist with a PhD? That, I am happy to share! Herewith I present Dr. Eleanor Jenega on No Nut November:
My loves, I am very sorry, but we have to talk about No Nut November. Why, you may ask, would I say something like that to you? And you would be right to do so. Why would I ask you to contemplate a month-long abstinence exercise for men propagated on reddit? The answer to that, sadly, is because the whole misguided, misogynist, pseudo-science binfire has all the hallmarks of medieval medical and theological thought on sex, and that is my job. I take no pleasure in saying this, because as you know, I think it is very important to be careful when using the word “medieval” to describe something. Yet, here we are.
For the up-until-this-point blissfully ignorant out there, No Nut November, (or NNN), was brought to us by the genius minds of Reddit, and the stated goal of these gentlemen is not to “nut” AKA orgasm for the month of November. (Yeah I’m not going to link this for you. It;s too weird.) Initially this idea spawned when some bright spark got a hold of one (1) study that showed a period of abstinence from masturbation in ten healthy men lead to a spike of testosterone production in the subjects. (Don’t even get me started on the sample size here.) This apparently is seen as a definitive good, and some dudes decided that they would refrain from jacking it for a month in order to get this extra hormone rush for some reason. (IDK. YKINMKATOK, I guess.)
She goes on with similar breezy stylings for another twenty or so paragraphs, my favorite of which is this one from near the end:
Fundamentally, I am very much of the position that people can do whatever they want with their bodies. Don’t want to wank? Fine. Don’t want to have sex with women? Even finer if you are the sort of woman-hating douche who thinks you can save up your magical sperm to have us pawing at you. What I am not fine with, however, is the misogyny at the heart of the idea, and the framing of what is fundamentally a discredited form of thinking as “rational”.
But, obviously, you should read the whole thing.
Similar Sex Blogging:
Shorter URL for sharing: https://www.erosblog.com/?p=21893
Idiot misogynists. And here I was thinking the NNN was the continuation of Locktober; which I’m sorry to see she didn’t write about because it’s a lot more fun to have your woman/partner lock you in a custom medical stainless-steel chastity cage and then giggle for weeks to herself/themself (no, really, i’m not being sarcastic here).
I am amused that she referred to GOTN’s post on masturbation.
Fuzzy, that’s a category of “fun” that makes me scratch my head and go “huh” but of course that doesn’t differentiate it from any of a thousand other kinky-fun practices that don’t happen to overlap with my own kinks, which are obviously fun, right? ;-)